Higher Education Accountability System  
West Texas A&M University Universities Performance
Institution Selection To see information on a particular institution/system,
select the institution below.

Always Show Contextual Measures
PDF Version This Section
Complete Report

Institutional mission statements

Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Key Measures

Administrative Cost

Out-Of-State Peers   FY 2000 FY 2014 FY 2015 Point Change
FY 2000 to
FY 2015
52. Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget 8.1% 11.2% 10.3% 2.2
 

Space Usage Efficiency (SUE)

53. Space usage efficiency measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of existing teaching space utilization. Classroom and lab passing score is 75 and overall passing score is 150.

  Fall 2014 Fall 2015
Classroom space use efficiency 41 49
Lab space use efficiency 49 83
Overall space use efficiency 90 132
 

Appropriated Funds per FTE Faculty

54. State appropriations divided by full-time equivalent students and annual full-time equivalent teaching faculty.

  FY 2001 FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change
FY 2001 to
FY 2015
Appropriated funds per FTE student $5,768 $5,180 $5,090 - 11.8%
Appropriated funds per FTE faculty $64,081 $59,326 $57,268 - 10.6%
 

Historically Underutilized Business (HUB)

  FY 2000 FY 2014 FY 2015 %/Point Change
FY 2000 to
FY 2015
55. HUB Expenditures without construction (Millions) $ 0.575 $ 0.821 $ 3.089 437.3%
Percent of total expenditures 4.4% 5.2% 10.5% 6.1
     HUB Expenditures with construction (Millions) $ 1.086 $ 2.746 $ 3.092 184.8%
Percent of total expenditures 8.2% 17.5% 10.5% 2.3
 

Operating Expenses per FTE Student

  FY 2001 FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change
FY 2001 to
FY 2015
56. Operating expenses per FTE student $10,665 $12,856 $12,881 20.8%
 

Total Revenue per FTE Student and FTE teaching Faculty

  FY 2000 FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change
FY 2000 to
FY 2015
57. Total revenue
Per FTE student $10,355 $14,587 $15,582 50.5%
Per FTE faculty $115,174 $167,069 $175,330 52.2%
 

Click Here to Show/Hide Contextual Measures