![]() |
| The University of Texas at Austin | Universities Performance |
| Accountability CB Home CB Data | Measures and Definitions Participation Success Excellence Research Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness Faculty Information Questions? |
|
Always Show Contextual Measures
|
Institutional mission statements |
| Out-Of-State Peers | FY 2000 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2012 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52. Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget
|
5.7% | 5.1% | 4.8% | - 0.9 | |
UT Austin continues to demonstrate efficient stewardship of resources by minimizing administrative costs wherever possible. Our goal is to remain well below the FY2004 to FY2007 Group target of <6%.
53. Space usage efficiency measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of existing teaching space utilization. Classroom and lab passing score is 75 and overall passing score is 150.

| Fall 2011 | Fall 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Classroom space use efficiency | 75 | 75 |
| Lab space use efficiency | 84 | 84 |
| Overall space use efficiency | 159 | 159 |
Our goal is to consistently exceed the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board standards for use of classrooms and laboratories. To that end, a number of space management initiatives are being implemented, including a newly established space management governance structure and office to develop metrics and benchmarks and to coordinate the work of departmental space managers. In addition, new information systems are being deployed to facilitate easier and more accurate maintenance of facilities data and its use in strategic decision-making.
54. State appropriations divided by full-time equivalent students and annual full-time equivalent teaching faculty.
| FY 2001 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | % Change FY 2001 to FY 2012 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appropriated funds per FTE student | $6,743 | $8,021 | $7,584 | 12.5% | |
| Appropriated funds per FTE faculty | $67,320 | $72,399 | $69,135 | 2.7% | |
| FY 2000 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | %/Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2012 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
55. HUB Expenditures without construction (Millions)
|
$ 22.230 | $ 39.658 | $ 40.948 | 84.2% | |
| Percent of total expenditures | 12.8% | 12.7% | 13.3% | 0.5 | |
| HUB Expenditures with construction (Millions) | $ 25.066 | $ 52.242 | $ 53.113 | 111.9% | |
| Percent of total expenditures | 14.4% | 16.8% | 17.3% | 2.9 | |
| FY 2001 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | % Change FY 2001 to FY 2012 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
56. Operating expenses per FTE student
|
$25,446 | $36,740 | $36,990 | 45.4% | |
| FY 2000 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | % Change FY 2000 to FY 2012 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
57. Total revenue
|
|||||
| Per FTE student | $20,477 | $40,593 | $39,783 | 94.3% | |
| Per FTE faculty | $781,888 | $366,385 | $362,632 | - 53.6% | |